People Under The Stairs Forums » Topic: Sigs

SLC HEAD on "Sigs"

SLC HEAD — Tue, 31 May 2005 20:45:19 +0000

Just think DOC you could get a SIG that said f*** A SIG!!!

docbeezy on "Sigs"

docbeezy — Tue, 17 May 2005 00:24:39 +0000

YoYoPo said: it's only cause you want to parade that PUTS sig ain't it?

hmm, I'm not sure. It could turn out bad - I've seen awful sigs recently

dont cave man! You run this muthafucka! HELL YEAH!

enjoilax on "Sigs"

enjoilax — Mon, 16 May 2005 23:20:10 +0000

YoYoPo said: it's only cause you want to parade that PUTS sig ain't it?

hmm, I'm not sure. It could turn out bad - I've seen awful sigs recently

MF Doom is in there and i would much rather make myself a new one for this board. People Under The Stairs at a People Under The Stairs site is a little redundant.

edit - You just need mods that you're 100% will keep an eye out and most importantly come here daily.

YoYoPo on "Sigs"

YoYoPo — Mon, 16 May 2005 21:43:29 +0000

it's only cause you want to parade that PUTS sig ain't it?

hmm, I'm not sure. It could turn out bad - I've seen awful sigs recently

enjoilax on "Sigs"

enjoilax — Mon, 16 May 2005 21:35:49 +0000

docbeezy said: isnt this sh!t dead yet!?!?!?!!?

No sigs, just move the f*** on. Life is better without them!

Whats the big f***ing deal? Its a maximum 300 x 100 px signature, that if you are creative and want to show off what you like and/or write what you have in your setup, then why not?

No need to piss on everyones parade cause you don't like em.
You don't even have majority, you have one other person in this thread who has said no. So thats 2 people.

YoYoPo - Please don't cave into the vocal minority, while sigs are not necessary they do add to a forums overall feel and allow for more personality than say an Avatar. I would much rather have signatures only than Avatars only. Just MHO.

docbeezy on "Sigs"

docbeezy — Mon, 16 May 2005 14:14:04 +0000

isnt this sh!t dead yet!?!?!?!!?

No sigs, just move the f*** on. Life is better without them!

enjoilax on "Sigs"

enjoilax — Mon, 16 May 2005 09:22:38 +0000

YoYoPo said: well, it's about 50 times easier just to not have them at all so I'm cool with that, I'm really not seeing much benefit from sigs at all. Besides how does this other forum enforce it? Do they just tell people not to have big annoying ones? Sounds a bit dubious to me

oh and slyjak I just remembered that as far as using html in posts goes, you can only use the b,i,u,pre tags

Exactly, + the mods have the ability to edit a person's sig. So if anyone goes over they just kill their sig, and tell em to change it or they lose their sig privelages.

/forum whore = me

YoYoPo on "Sigs"

YoYoPo — Sun, 15 May 2005 10:52:04 +0000

well, it's about 50 times easier just to not have them at all so I'm cool with that, I'm really not seeing much benefit from sigs at all. Besides how does this other forum enforce it? Do they just tell people not to have big annoying ones? Sounds a bit dubious to me

oh and slyjak I just remembered that as far as using html in posts goes, you can only use the b,i,u,pre tags

enjoilax on "Sigs"

enjoilax — Sun, 15 May 2005 04:54:18 +0000

Why don't you just set limits and enforce them? make some people mods and start enforcing it? Not that hard if iPodLounge.com can do it, and they have WAY more members than here.

Just mho.

Out-On-The-Porch on "Sigs"

Out-On-The-Porch — Sat, 14 May 2005 22:52:11 +0000

aaah bollocks. Ah well, you're the boss. But small, sensible sigs are mint.